Streamlining IaC Updates: How Git Cherry-Pick Saved My Workflow

2 minute read
Content level: Intermediate
0

The article shares how using Git's cherry-pick helped me apply specific IaC changes from a test branch to master without merging all changes, streamlining my workflow. It highlights the efficiency and simplicity of cherry-pick in managing selective commits, reducing risks and conflicts.

I was working on some Infrastructure as Code (IaC) updates recently, and it was one of those days where everything felt more complicated than it should be. The test branch had a lot of changes, and while I needed just a few specific updates, the idea of pushing all of them to master seemed like a risky move. I really didn’t want to merge everything, especially since some parts of the code weren’t fully tested yet. But then, I remembered git cherry-pick.

It was like a lightbulb moment. Instead of doing a full branch merge, where I’d have to deal with a lot of unrelated changes and possibly break something, I could just pick out the exact commit I needed. That’s when I decided to cherry-pick the commit I wanted.

Here’s how it went down:

  • I switched over to the master branch, pulled the latest changes, and then ran git log on the test branch to grab the specific commit hash I needed

git log test

  • Now that you have the commit ID, you can apply it to the master branch with:

git cherry-pick <commit-hash>

  • Example: git cherry-pick abc1234

  • Resolve Any Conflicts (If Necessary)

  • Once the cherry-pick is complete and all conflicts are resolved (if any), push the updated master branch back to the remote repository: git push origin master

profile picture
EXPERT
published a month ago67 views