- Neueste
- Die meisten Stimmen
- Die meisten Kommentare
Hello,
It's not completely clear which part of CUDOS you're talking about. Are you talking about the DynamoDB tab with the table "TOP 15 Candidates for IA Tables Last 30 Days"?
If this is the section you're talking about, you've changed these recommended tables to Infrequent Access and you're not seeing the costs go down? Ensure that you've only changed tables you don't access frequently to Standard-IA as there is a higher read/write cost on these tables once you move them to this storage tier.
The recommendation in CUDOS is based on your read/write usage of these particular tables. If the read/write usage is low, then a recommendation is made to move them to Standard-IA.
Hello, thanks for the answer,
Yes, I'm talking about the Top 15, you can see the estimation for the month before making, and there is an estimation for the month after making the change. Now, when I checked, this table is not in the top 15 list, also no saving, in fact, there is a slight increase. What I mean is, when these numbers are calculated, they are already calculated based on throughput and storage information, and an estimation is made. I see that it's not very accurate to take action based on these estimations. Proceeding via https://calculator.aws/#/createCalculator/DynamoDB will provide more accurate results. Do you have any suggestions regarding the cudos dashboards or any method to improve the results of this dashboard.
Relevanter Inhalt
- AWS OFFICIALAktualisiert vor 2 Jahren
- AWS OFFICIALAktualisiert vor 3 Jahren