2 réponses
- Le plus récent
- Le plus de votes
- La plupart des commentaires
0
Hello.
As you know, it is possible to host React.js on S3.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/patterns/deploy-a-react-based-single-page-application-to-amazon-s3-and-cloudfront.html
In terms of server management costs, I think hosting with S3 will be cheaper.
There shouldn't be much of a difference in data transfer charges between EC2 and S3.
https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/?nc1=h_ls
https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/?nc1=h_ls#Data_Transfer
0
S3 will be cheaper , you only pay storage. Data transfer will apply to both
répondu il y a 7 mois
Contenus pertinents
- demandé il y a 4 mois
- demandé il y a un an
- AWS OFFICIELA mis à jour il y a 2 ans
- AWS OFFICIELA mis à jour il y a 2 ans
- AWS OFFICIELA mis à jour il y a 3 ans
- AWS OFFICIELA mis à jour il y a un an
Agreed, If you compare monthly storage price of 1 GB in S3 to the hourly cost of your instance of choice, you'll be able to compute the savings
If you put CloudFront in front of the S3 bucket, the data transfer costs will generally lower than serving from S3 directly plus it has quite a generous free tier.
https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/