How to avoid circular dependency between transit gateway and route table?

0

In Cloudformation template I have an option to define AssociationDefaultRouteTableId and PropagationDefaultRouteTableId for TransitGateway.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-ec2-transitgateway.html

Type: AWS::EC2::TransitGateway
Properties: 
  ...
  AssociationDefaultRouteTableId: String
  ...
  PropagationDefaultRouteTableId: String

But TransitGatewayRouteTable has mandatory parameter TransitGatewayId and this causes a circular dependency between route table and transit gateway :-(

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-ec2-transitgatewayroutetable.html

Type: AWS::EC2::TransitGatewayRouteTable
Properties: 
  ...
  TransitGatewayId: String

Is there a way to get around this somehow and actually set AssociationDefaultRouteTableId and PropagationDefaultRouteTableId for transit gateway from Cloudformation template ?

1 Risposta
1
Risposta accettata

I don't think you'll be able to do this how you are trying as the circular dependency will always be there.

One way that you may be able to achieve the same outcome is by using a custom lambda resource to modify the TGW defaults after it's created. Here is an example from github: https://github.com/alexandrespbr/vpcsharednfw/blob/3aad9e78c08610b2e3602364158f78867338db39/egressVpc.yaml#L475

AWS
con risposta 2 anni fa
profile picture
ESPERTO
Kallu
verificato 6 mesi fa
  • Thanks! This is my thinking as well. The only thing it doesn't explain why such parameters were made available for TransitGateway resource type you can not possibly use. Looks like a bug and missing feature (that ability to set route table id's).

Accesso non effettuato. Accedi per postare una risposta.

Una buona risposta soddisfa chiaramente la domanda, fornisce un feedback costruttivo e incoraggia la crescita professionale del richiedente.

Linee guida per rispondere alle domande