Why create a public virtual interface? Why not create a private virtual interface?
replied 3 years ago
Thank you for your comment. We'll review and update the Knowledge Center article as needed.
Sanity check: Will the bandwidth supported in this solution still be 1.25Gbps as in a regular site-to-site VPN over Internet?
replied 3 years ago
Thank you for your comment. We'll review and update the Knowledge Center article as needed.
@Richard: Thank you for your question, you can create AWS Site to Site VPN to Transit Gateway only over a transit VIF or a Public VIF. AWS Site to Site VPN is not supported over a Private VIF.
@Rafael: Thank you for your question. AWS Site to Site VPN supports bandwidth of upto 1.25Gbps or 140,000 PPS. As long as your underlay network (Direct Connect or Internet) is able to support this bandwidth you should be fine. Please read this blog which talks about optimizing performance for our AWS Site to Site VPN.
It seems the recommendation provided in the article to ue public VIF is dated. AWS now supports private IP VPNs over transit VIFs, eliminating public IP dependencies. Check this article which for obvious reason is better from security perspective. @ Moderators - Please can you check and update the recommendations accordingly.
replied a year ago
Thank you for your comment. We'll review and update the Knowledge Center article as needed.
Relevant content
asked 3 years ago
asked 2 years ago
asked 6 years ago
asked 4 years ago
