1 Answer
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
Customers retain control over their upgrade timing by choosing to perform it manually using the documented steps beforehand. The automatic option is a fallback if they are unable to upgrade proactively. Over time, as more customers complete the migration, AWS may learn lessons that could streamline the automated process further. But a controlled, voluntary migration allows gathering feedback first. Learn > Add to automated upgrade process (but could be failed in customer's certain condition) So if your env is production, my suggestion would be to schedule an upgrade as soon as feasible following the steps in the documentation. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/upgrade-from-amazon-aurora-serverless-v1-to-v2-with-minimal-downtime/
answered 8 months ago
Relevant content
- Accepted Answerasked a month ago
- asked 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated a month ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated a year ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago