- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
If you expect the SQS URL to remain constant and do not anticipate needing to frequently change the queue or account, the simpler approach of hardcoding the URL may be suitable. This approach indeed reduces latency and the amount of code you need to maintain. The risk, as you pointed out, is that if Amazon were to change the URL structure in the future, your code might break. However, it's worth noting that such changes are typically rare and are usually accompanied by lengthy deprecation periods, during which both the old and new formats would continue to work. On the other hand, using the getQueueUrl API to dynamically generate the SQS URL provides more flexibility. This method would be beneficial if you foresee needing to interact with multiple queues or accounts, or if the queue name might change. Furthermore, this approach is more robust to potential future changes in AWS's URL structure.
Relevant content
- Accepted Answerasked 4 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 4 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 3 years ago