- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
Hello.
I think the disadvantage of moving to IPv6-only is that users who currently use ISPs that can only use IPv4 will not be able to access applications.
Additionally, some AWS services do not support IPv6, so applications may not be able to access AWS services until IPv6 is supported.
If the cost of IPv4 is not acceptable, I think it is better to use only IPv6 only.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/aws-ipv6-support.html
Therefore, I thought it would be a good idea to host IPv4 and IPv6 in a dual stack at first, and then transition to IPv6-only in the future.
IPv6 has greater advantages than IPv4, but support is delayed in some aspects, so you must accept these disadvantages when using them.
Hi
Please look at the resources posted https://repost.aws/questions/QUPlstoCQoSOmzt15LMd0C1g/migrating-from-an-ipv4-network-to-an-ipv6-network
Alternative Solution: Using a private network Ec2(Without Public IP) with a frontend Application Load Balancer (ALB) is a great alternative
Relevant content
- Accepted Answerasked 4 months ago
- asked 7 months ago
- asked 4 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 3 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated a year ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 months ago
Thank you for the response. The articles that you shared are very helpful. We don't need a load balancer since our user base is very small. Also, it costs money to use one and we are trying to minimize our cost. That is the reason I asked the question. Thanks again.